International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering and Management
Year: 2021, Volume: 8, Issue: 6
First page : ( 1114) Last page : ( 1116)
Online ISSN : 2350-0557.
DOI: 10.55524/ijirem.2021.8.6.219 |
DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.55524/ijirem.2021.8.6.219
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
Article Tools: Print the Abstract | Indexing metadata | How to cite item | Email this article | Post a Comment
Roopam Bachhil , Anupam Bachhil , Dr. Shantanu Kumar Srivastava
The higher education sector is in the midst of fundamental change. Never before has there been such intense public debate about the place of the university and its role in society. During the 1980s and 1990 there was significant growth in the number of student studying part–time and through distance learning. The single most dramatic effect of paradigm shift is learner sovereignty. The teacher role at least as defined by the instructvists now belongs to a bygone era. Students have much greater autonomy over their learning, in terms of when, where and how they learn. Interaction with fellow students and faculty are literally (and metaphorically) at their fingertips. In this review paper an asynchronous discussion boards as the modus operandi, learner interaction is heightened.
[1] Sharma, R. C., & Mishras. (2013). International Handbook on e-Learning, Vol. 2.
[2] Harden, R. M., & Hart, I. R. (2002). An international virtual medical school (IVIMEDS): The future for medical education. Medical Teacher, 24, 261-267
[3] Laurillard, D. (2006). E-learning in higher education. Changing Higher Education: The Development of Learning and Teaching, 71-84.
[4] Sing, P. P., & Sharma, S. (2005). ELearning New Trends and Innovations (pp. 39). New Delhi: Deep and Deep Publications Pvt. Ltd.
[5] Jaiswal, V. (2013). Current Status of elearning in Indian higher education: A case study of U.P.Retrieved from the Social Science ResearchNetwork (SSRN) website: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2231910
[6] Tayebinik, M., & Puteh, M. (2012). Blended learning or elearning? International Magazine on Advancesin Computer Science and Telecomm unications (IMACST), 3(1), 103-110.
[7] Caudron, S. (1999) 'Free Agent Learner', Training and Development, August, 27-31.
[8] Clarke, T and Hermens, A. (2001) 'Corporate developments and strategic alliances in e-learning', Education and Training', 43(4), 256-677.
[9] Dringus, L. (2000) 'Towards Active Online Learning: A Dramatic Shift in Perspectives for Learner', The Internet and Higher Education, 2(4) 189-95.
[10] Galaghan, P. A. (2000) 'E-learning Revolution', Training and Development, 54(12)25-30.
[11] Hicks, S. (2000) 'Evaluating E-learning', Training and Development, December, 77- 79.
[12] Horwath, A. (1999) 'Novice Users' Reaction to a Web Enriched Classroom, Virtual
[13] Swanson, S. (2001) 'E-learning Branches Out', Information Week, February, 42-60.
[14] Vicere, A. (2000) 'Ten Observations on E-learning and Leadership Development',
[15] Human Resource Planning, 23(4), 34-46. Wilson, J. (1999) 'Internet Training: The time is Now' HR Focus, 76(3), 3.
Research Scholar, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, India
No. of Downloads: 17 | No. of Views: 490
Janhvee Mishra, Dr. Shantanu Srivastava.
April 2022 - Vol 9, Issue 2
Anupam Bachhil , Roopam Bachhil , Dr. Shantanu Kumar Srivastava.
November 2021 - Vol 8, Issue 6
Punam Agarwal, Anupam Bachhil, Amit Singh, Dr. Shantanu Kumar Srivastava.
September 2021 - Vol 8, Issue 5