Understanding the Relationship Between Entrepreneurship and Project Management

Dr. Jagadish Brahma Goulap

Abstract

Purpose: In the present world of globalization, both economic prosperity and social progress depend a lot on entrepreneurial ventures and investors’ willingness to invest in different kinds of projects. However, these sorts of ventures and investments have their respective sets of risks and challenges. Seeing this situation, academics and experts of this field have started paying close attention to Entrepreneurship and Project Management (E&PM). Over the past 30 years, these two fields have been witnessing unprecedented developments. From the historical perspective, these two are multidisciplinary fields and both fields are progressing side by side with distinctive developmental parameters and cultures. The aim of this paper is to present a comprehensive dialogic conversation between these two discrete perspectives and interlinked propositions: First, E&PM should stay connected and second, E&PM should converge. Approach/Design/ Methodology: With an aim to guide the close examination of these propositions, the authors find the necessity of Luhmann and a methodical discursive outlook of both the fields of discourses. The ultimate purpose is to add some valuable content to the on-going debate related to the following questions: Are E & PM are so distinct from one another that they are incompatible? If so, is it good for an economy and business? Findings: The paper concludes that E & PM may stay away from each other as they bear various dissimilarities. This is better that they remain separated from each other as distance generates a creative tension between them that ultimately does good to both these sectors. Originality/Value: Many researchers in this field have established focus on linking E & PM. They opine that entrepreneurship and project management have underlying agreement on several aspects. The target of this paper is to provide a broader dialogical conversation between these two perspectives and the propositions: E&PM should stay separate and E&PM should converge. While doing so, this paper resides on Luhaman and methodical discursive point of view.

Keywords

Entrepreneurship, Project management, Economic prosperity, Social progress.

Reference

1. Alvarez, S.A. and Barney, J.B. (2013), “Epistemology, opportunities, and entrepreneurship: comments on Venkataraman et al. (2012) and Shane (2012)”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 154-157.

2. Anbari, F.T. (1985), “A systems approach to project evaluation”, Project Management Journal, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 21-26.

3. Andersen, E.S., Grude, K.V. and Haug, T. (2004), Goal Directed Project Management, Kogan Page, London.

4. Archibald, R.D. and Villoria, R.L. (1967), Network-Based Management Systems (PERT/CPM), Wiley, New York, NY.

5. Audet, M. and Malouin, J.-L. (Eds) (1986), Le procès des connaissances de l’administration, La production des connaissances de l’administration, Presses de l’Université Laval, pp. 23-66.

6. Barczak, G. and Wilemon, D. (1989), “Leadership differences in new product development teams”,

7. Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 259-267.

8. Barnes, M. (1983), “How to allocate risks in construction contracts”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 24-28.

9. Bateson, G. (1972), Steps to an Ecology of Mind, Ballantine, New York, NY. Bernstein, R.J. (1982), “What is the difference that makes a difference? Gadamer, Habermas, and Rorty”,

10. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2, pp. 331-359.

11. Bredillet, C. (2013), “ ‘A’ discourse on the non-method”, in Drouin, N., Müller, R. and Sankaran, S. (Eds), Novel Approaches to Organizational Project Management Research: Translational and Transformational, Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen, pp. 56-94.

12. Bredillet, C.N. (2010), “Blowing hot and cold on project management”, Project Management Journal, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 4-20.

13. Brettel, M., Mauer, R., Engelen, A. and Küpper, D. (2012), “Corporate effectuation: entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 167-184.

14. Bröckling, U. (2016), The Entrepreneurial Self: Fabricating a New Type of Subject, Sage Publications Ltd, Los Angeles, CA.

15. Bruyat, C. (1994), “Contributions épistémologiques au domaine de l’entrepreneuriat”, Revue française de gestion, Vol. 101, November-December, pp. 87-99.

16. Bygrave, W.D. and Hofer, C.W. (1991), “Theorizing about entrepreneurship”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 13-22.

17. Casson, M. (1982), The Entrepreneur: An Economic Theory, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD. Christensen, C.M. and Raynor, M.E. (2003), The Innovator’s Solution: Creating and Sustaining

18. Successful Growth, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

19. Cleland, D.I. and King, W.R. (1968/1983), Systems Analysis and Project Management, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

20. Cooke-Davies, T.J. (2002), “The ‘real’ success factors on projects”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 185-190.

21. Cova, B. and Sale, R. (2005), “Six points to merge project marketing into project management”,

22. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 23 No. 5, pp. 354-359.

23. Covin, J.G. and Miles, M.P. (1999), “Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of competitive advantage”, Entrepreneurship: Theory and practice, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 47-63.

24. Covin, J.G. and Slevin, D.P. (1989), “Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 75-87.

25. Covin, J.G., Garrett, R.P., Kuratko, D.F. and Shepherd, D.A. (2015), “Value proposition evolution and the performance of internal corporate ventures”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 749-774.

26. Crawford, L.H., Hobbs, J.B. and Turner, J.R. (2005), Project Categorization Systems: Aligning Capability with Strategy for Better Results, Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA.

27. Culié, J.D., Khapova, S.N. and Arthur, M.B. (2014), “Careers, clusters and employment mobility: the influences of psychological mobility and organizational support”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 84 No. 2, pp. 164-176.

28. DeFillippi, R. and Spring, S. (2004), “Project entrepreneurs for project-based enterprises: extension or complement to project management competencies?”, Projects and Profits, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 50-57.

29. Dess, G.G. and Lumpkin, G.T. (2005), “The role of entrepreneurial orientation in stimulating effective corporate entrepreneurship”, The Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 147-156.

30. Ferriani, S., Cattani, G. and Baden-Fuller, C. (2009), “The relational antecedents of project-entrepreneurship: network centrality, team composition and project performance”, Research Policy, Vol. 38 No. 10, pp. 1545-1558.

31. Fiol, C.M. (2001), “Revisiting an identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol. 27 No. 6, pp. 691-699.

32. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006), “From Nobel Prize to project management: getting risks right”, Project Management Journal, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 5-15.

33. Flyvbjerg, B. (Ed.) (2017), The Oxford Handbook of Megaproject Management, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

34. Fonrouge, C. (1999), “De l’entrepreneur à l’entreprise: exploration de l’influence des facteurs individuels d’ordre cognitif sur la formation des stratégies des entreprises nouvellement créées”, doctoral dissertation, Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV, Bordeaux.

35. Fonrouge, C. (2002), “L’entrepreneur et son entreprise: une relations dialogique”, Revue française de gestion, Vol. 28 No. 138, pp. 145-158.

36. Foreman, S. (1996), “Internal marketing”, in Turner, J.R., Grude, K.V. and Thurloway, P. (Eds),

37. The Project Manager as Change Agent, McGraw-Hill, London, pp. 116-125.

38. Fouché, C. (2011), “Conceptual linking between entrepreneurship and project management: what can we learn? A co-word analysis”, doctoral dissertation, SKEMA Business School, Lille.

39. Frederiksen, L. and Davies, A. (2008), “Vanguards and ventures: projects as vehicles for corporate entrepreneurship”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 26 No. 5, pp. 487-496.

40. Galbraith, J.R. (1973), Designing Complex Organizations, Addison-Wesley Longman, Boston, MA. Gareis, R. (2005), Happy Projects!, Manz, Vienna.

41. Gartner, W.B. (1989), “‘Who is an entrepreneur?’: is the wrong question”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 47-68.

42. Garud, R. and Giuliani, A.P. (2013), “A narrative perspective on entrepreneurial opportunities”,

43. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 157- 160.

44. Global Commission on the Economy and Climate (2016), “The sustainable infrastructure imperative: financing forbetter growth and development”, The 2016 New Climate Economy Report, The New Climate Economy, Washington, DC, available at: http://newclimateeconomy.report/2016/ misc/downloads/ (access 7 April 2018).

45. Global Infrastructure Hub (2017), Global Infrastructure Outlook: Infrastructure Investment Needs 50 Countries, 7 sectors to 2040, Global Infrastructure Hub, Sydney.

46. Grégoire, D.A., Corbett, A.C. and McMullen, J.S. (2011), “The cognitive perspective in entrepreneurship: an agenda for future research”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 48 No. 6, pp. 1443-1477.

47. Hernes, T. and Bakken, T. (2003), “Implications of selfreference: Niklas Luhmann’s autopoiesis and organization theory”, Organization Studies, Vol. 24 No. 9, pp. 1511-1535.

48. Huang, L. and Knight, A.P. (2017), “Resources and relationships in entrepreneurship: an exchange theory of the development and effects of the entrepreneur-investor relationship”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 80-102.

49. Huemann, M., Keegan, A.E. and Turner, J.R. (2007), “Human resource management in the project oriented company: a critical review”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 312-320.

50. Joubert, J. (1850), “Pensées, essais, maximes et correspondance de J. Joubert, précédés d’une notice sur sa vie, son caractère et ses travaux”, in Raynal, P. (Ed.), Le Normant, Paris.

51. Kilduff, M., Mehra, A. and Dunn, M.B. (2011), “From blue sky research to problem solving: a philosophy of science theory of new knowledge production”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 297-317.

52. Kiznyte, J., Welker, M. and Dechange, A. (2016), “Applying project management methods to the creation of a start-up business plan: the case of Blendlee”, PM World Journal, Vol. 5 No. 5, pp. 1-24.

53. Klotz, A.C. and Neubaum, D.O. (2016), “Research on the dark side of personality traits in entrepreneurship: observations from an organizational behavior perspective”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 7- 17.

54. Kuura, A., Blackburn, R.A. and Lundin, R.A. (2014), “Entrepreneurship and projects – linking segregated communities”, Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 214-230.

55. Lin, C.P., Tsai, Y.H. and Liu, M.L. (2016), “Something good and something bad in R&D teams: effects of social identification and dysfunctional behavior”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 104, March, pp. 191- 199.

56. Lindgren, M. and Packendorff, J. (2003), “A project-based view of entrepreneurship: towards action-orientation, seriality and collectivity”, in Steyaert, C. and Hjorth, D. (Eds), New Movements in Entrepreneurship, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 86-102.

57. Luhmann, N. (1989), Ecological Communication, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. 58. Luhmann, N. (1992), “Operational closure and structural coupling: the differentiation of the legal system”, Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 1419-1441.

59. Luhmann, N. (1995), Social Systems, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

60. Luhmann, N. (2005), “The autopoiesis of social systems”, in Seidl, D. and Becker, K. (Eds), Niklas Luhmann and Organization Studies, Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press, Frederiksberg and Copenhagen, pp. 64-82.

61. Lundin, R.A., Arvidson, N., Brady, T., Ekstedt, E., Midler, C. and Sydow, J. (2015), Managing and Working in Project Society: Institutional Challenges of Temporary Organizations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

62. McElroy, W. and Mills, C. (2007), “Managing stakeholders”, in Turner, J.R. (Ed.), The Gower Handbook of Project Management, 4th ed., Gower, Aldershot, pp. 757-778.

63. McKeever, E., Jack, S. and Anderson, A. (2015), “Embedded entrepreneurship in the creative re-construction of place”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 50-65.

64. Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2008), “On the problem of participation in strategy: a critical discursive perspective”, Organization Science, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 341-358.

65. Matthyssens, P. and Vandenbempt, K. (1998), “Creating competitive advantage in industrial services”,

66. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, Vol. 13 Nos 4- 5, pp. 339-355.

67. Maturana, H.R. and Varela, F.J. (1980), Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living,

68. D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht and Boston, MA.

69. Meredith, J.R. and Mantel, S.J. Jr (2006), Project Management: A Managerial Approach, 9th ed., Wiley, New York, NY.

70. Midler, C. and Silberzahn, P. (2008), “Managing robust development process for high-tech startups through multiproject learning: the case of two European start-ups”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 26 No. 5, pp. 479-486.

71. Morin, E. (1984), Sociologie, Fayard, Paris.

72. Morris, P.W.G. (1997), The Management of Projects, 2nd ed., Thomas Telford, London. Morris, P.W.G. and Hough, G.H. (1987), The Anatomy of Major Projects: A study of the Reality of Project

73. Management, Wiley, Chichester.

74. Muller, R. and Turner, J.R. (2007), “Matching the project manager’s leadership style to project type”,

75. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 21-32.

76. Nicolai, A.T. (2004), “The bridge to the ‘real world’: applied science or a ‘schizophrenic tour de force’?”,

77. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 41 No. 6, pp. 951-976.

78. Orlikowski, W.J. (2007), “Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work”, Organization Studies, Vol. 28 No. 9, pp. 1435-1448.

79. Pinto, J.K. and Slevin, D.P. (1987), “Critical factors in successful project implementation”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 22-27.

80. Project Management Institute (2013), A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), 5th ed., Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA.

81. Project Management Institute (2016), “The high cost of low performance: how will you improve business results? PMI’s Pulse of the Profession®, 8th Global Project Management Survey”, Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA.

82. Project Management Institute (2017), “Transforming high cost of low performance: success rates rise: PMI’s Pulse of the Profession®, 9th Global Project Management Survey”, Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA.

83. Sarasvathy, S.D. (2001), “Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 243-263.

84. Seidl, D. (2007), “General strategy concepts and the ecology of strategy discourses: a systemic- discursive perspective”, Organization Studies, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 197-218.

85. Seidl, D. and Becker, K. (Eds) (2005), Niklas Luhmann and Organization Studies, Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press, Frederiksberg and Copenhagen.

86. Seidl, D. and Becker, K.H. (2006), “Organizations as distinction generating and processing systems: Niklas Luhmann’s contribution to organization studies”, Organization, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 9-35.

87. Seidl, D. and Mormann, H. (2014), “Niklas Luhmann as organization theorist”, in Adler, P.S., Du Gay, P., Morgan, G. and Reed, M. (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Sociology, Social Theory, and Organization Studies: Contemporary Currents, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 125-157.

88. Shane, S. (2012), “Reflections on the 2010 AMR decade award: delivering on the promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 10-20.

89. Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S. (2000), “The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research”, 90. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 217- 226.

91. Shaver, K.G. and Scott, L.R. (1992), “Person, process, choice: the psychology of new venture creation”,

92. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 23- 46.

93. Shenhar, A.J. and Dvir, D. (1996), “Toward a typological theory of project management”, Research Policy, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 607-632.

94. Smith, W.K. and Lewis, M.W. (2011), “Toward a theory of paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 381- 403.

95. Smith, W.K. and Tracey, P. (2016), “Institutional complexity and paradox theory: complementarities of competing demands”, Strategic Organization, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 455- 466.

96. Stettina, C.J. and Hörz, J. (2015), “Agile portfolio management: an empirical perspective on the practice in use”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 140-152.

97. Teubner, G. (2000), “Contracting worlds: the many autonomies of private law”, Social and Legal Studies, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 399-417.

98. Tsoukas, H. and Hatch, M.J. (2001), “Complex thinking, complex practice: the case for a narrative approach to organizational complexity”, Human Relations, Vol. 54 No. 8, pp. 979-1013.

99. Turner, J.R. (2004), “Project contract management: incomplete in its entirety”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 75-83.

100. Turner, J.R. and Cochrane, R.A. (1993), “The goals and methods matrix: coping with projects with ill-defined goals and/or methods of achieving them”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 93-102.

101. Turner, J.R., Huemann, M. and Keegan, A.E. (2007), Human Resource Management in the Project- Oriented Organization, Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA.

102. Turner, R., Anbari, F. and Bredillet, C.N. (2013), “Perspectives on research in project management – the nine schools”, Global Business Perspectives, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 3- 28.

103. Venkataraman, S. (1997), “The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: an editor’s perspective”, in Katz, J. and Brockhaus, R. (Eds), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, Vol. 3, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 119-138.

104. Von Mises, L. (1949), Human Action: A Treatise on Economics, 4th revised ed., Fox & Wilkes, San Francisco, CA.

105. Vogel, P. (2016), “From venture idea to venture opportunity”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 41 No. 6, pp. 943-971.

106. Wegerif, R. (2008), “Dialogic or dialectic? The significance of ontological assumptions in research on educational dialogue”, British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 347-361.

107. Williams, T. (2002), Modelling Complex Projects, Wiley, Chichester.

108. Winch, G.M. (1989), “The construction firm and the construction project: a transaction cost approach”,

109. Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 331-345.

110. Youker, R. (1977), “Organization alternatives for project managers”, Management Review, Vol. 66 No. 11, pp. 46-53.

111. Further reading

112. Bredillet, C.N. (2004), “Theories and research in project management: critical review and return to the future”, doctoral dissertation, Lille School of Management, Lille.

113. Bredillet, C.N., Conboy, K., Davidson, P. and Walker, D. (2013), “The getting of wisdom: the future of PM university education in Australia”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 31 No. 8, pp. 1072-1088.

114. Casson, M. (2005), “Entrepreneurship and the theory of the Firm”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 58 No. 2, pp. 327-348.

115. Cooke-Davies, T.J., Crawford, L.H. and Lechler, T.G. (2009), “Project management systems: moving project management from an operational to a strategic discipline”, Project Management Journal, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 110-123.

116. Kwak, Y.H. and Anbari, F.T. (2008), Impact on Project Management of Allied Disciplines: Trends and Future of Project Management Practices and Research, Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA.

117. Schlesinger, L.A., Kiefer, C.F. and Brown, P.B. (2012), “New project? Don’t analyze – act”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 90 No. 3, pp. 154-158.

118. Shenhar, A.J. and Dvir, D. (2007), “Project management research – the challenge and opportunity”,

119. Project Management Journal, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 93-99.

120. Söderlund, J. (2002), “On the development of project management research: schools of thought and critique”, Project Perspectives, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 20-31.

121. Söderlund, J. (2011), “Pluralism in project management: navigating the crossroads of specialization and fragmentation”, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 153-176.

Cites this article as

[Dr. Jagadish Brahma Goulap (2018), Understanding the Relationship Between Entrepreneurship and Project Management, International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Management (IJIREM), Vol-5, Issue-6, Page No-222-235], (ISSN 2347 - 5552). www.ijirem.org