International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering and Management
Year: 2026, Volume: 13, Issue: 5
First page : ( 1) Last page : ( 14)
Online ISSN : 2350-0557
DOI: 10.55524/ijirem.2026.13.5.1 |
DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.55524/ijirem.2026.13.5.1
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
Article Tools: Print the Abstract | Indexing metadata | How to cite item | Email this article | Post a Comment
Chia-Ling Chen
International maritime environmental regulation is changing port sustainability from a predominantly local environmental-management task into a cross-organisational challenge involving vessels, energy systems, terminal operations, logistics customers, public authorities, and port-city communities. This article examines how the International Maritime Organization’s greenhouse-gas framework and the European Union’s FuelEU Maritime regime transmit strategic pressure to the non-EU Port of Keelung in Taiwan. The study develops a qualitative, embedded single-port research design that combines regulatory mapping, documentary analysis, official performance evidence, and a transparent Keelung Port Regulatory–Energy Transition Readiness Index (K-RTRI). The index is a diagnostic instrument rather than an emissions inventory. It assesses five dimensions on a 0–4 ordinal scale: regulatory exposure, infrastructure preparedness, governance and disclosure, operational incentives, and just-transition capacity. Evidence indicates that Keelung has moved beyond general aspiration. Its ESG roadmap, EcoPort engagement, smart-port initiatives, carbon-reduction programme, port-city cooperation, and planned high-voltage shore-power system at East Wharf No. 4 show meaningful institutional mobilisation. At the same time, publicly available evidence remains stronger for plans and implementation outputs than for recurring measurements of electricity delivered, actual shore-power connections, fuel displaced, or verified emissions avoided. The conservative overall K-RTRI score is 2.0 out of 4.0, signalling emerging readiness with a significant implementation and verification gap. The article proposes a management framework based on regulatory anticipation, contracted utilisation of clean-energy infrastructure, tiered green-port services, modular investment, verified data architecture, and a just port-city transition. The central argument is that Keelung’s competitive advantage will depend less on selecting a single future fuel than on building a governance architecture capable of converting regulatory uncertainty into coordinated investment, measurable environmental performance, and socially legitimate port services.
Assistant Professor, Department of Maritime Police, Central Police University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
No. of Downloads: 11 | No. of Views: 55
