Volume- 8
Issue- 6
Year- 2021
DOI: 10.55524/ijirem.2021.8.6.141 | DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.55524/ijirem.2021.8.6.141
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
Article Tools: Print the Abstract | Indexing metadata | How to cite item | Email this article | Post a Comment
Pooja Sharma
Systems for teaching. Have been found to promote active learning and a positive attitude to information acquisition. Another of the secrets to the Eidolons' effective and efficient use is how participants embrace and perceive them. The present study is motivated by the need of understanding instructors' and students' perspectives on Imps in order to anticipate future problems and create a constructive instructional atmosphere and a devoted userbase. The following issues are discussed at a Russian institution where the system is being incorporated: shareholder qualification and willingness to utilize LMS, as well as their judgments of the state's accessibility, potency, and usefulness. The research reveals significant disparities in students' and instructors' perceptions of several parts of LMS, that should be considered when enhancing the game's effectiveness and raising devotion to it. Learning. They are studied and discussed in this article.
[1] K. Kabassi, I. Dragonas, A. Ntouzevits, T. Pomonis, G. Papastathopoulos, and Y. Vozaitis, “Evaluating a learning management system for blended learning in Greek higher education,” Springerplus, 2016, doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1705-8.
[2] D. A. Back, F. Behringer, N. Haberstroh, J. P. Ehlers, K. Sostmann, and H. Peters, “Learning management system and e-learning tools: An experience of medical students’ usage and expectations,” Int. J. Med. Educ., 2016, doi: 10.5116/ijme.57a5.f0f5.
[3] N. N. M. Kasim and F. Khalid, “Choosing the right learning management system (LMS) for the higher education institution context: A systematic review,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., 2016, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v11i06.5644.
[4] S. N. W. Shamsuddin, M. F. Selman, I. Ismail, M. M. Amin, and N. A. Rawi, “A conceptual framework for gamified learning management system for LINUS students,” Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., 2018, doi: 10.11591/ijeecs.v12.i3.pp1380-1385.
[5] A. Marks, M. AL-Ali, and K. Rietsema, “Learning management systems: A Shift Toward learning and academic analytics,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., 2016, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v11i04.5419.
[6] S. Yalçinalp and H. TürkoÄŸlu, “Prospective teacher’s views using facebook as learning management system,” Milli EÄŸitim Derg., 2017.
[7] R. Medina-Flores and R. Morales-Gamboa, “Usability Evaluation by Experts of a Learning Management System,” Rev. Iberoam. Tecnol. del Aprendiz., 2015, doi: 10.1109/RITA.2015.2486298.
[8] T. Kaewkiriya, N. Utakrit, and H. Tsuji, “Experimental evaluation of distributed e-Learning management system,” 2011, doi: 10.1109/TENCON.2011.6129301.
[9] J. M. Little-Wiles, S. P. Hundley, and A. Koehler, “Work in progress - Maximizing student engagement in a learning management system,” 2010, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2010.5673377.
[10] T. Kalnins-Cole and D. Peters, “Towards an accessible learning management system,” Int. J. Contin. Eng. Educ. Life-Long Learn., 2007, doi: 10.1504/IJCEELL.2007.013232.
Assistant Professor, Department of Agri-business Management, Vivekananda Global University, Jaipur, India Email Id- pooja.sharma@vgu.ac.in
No. of Downloads: 13 | No. of Views: 476
Ajaz Ahmad Mallah.
November 2021 - Vol 8, Issue 6
Apoorva Upadhary.
November 2021 - Vol 8, Issue 6
Bhavani Dongabanti.
November 2021 - Vol 8, Issue 6