Volume- 8
Issue- 6
Year- 2021
DOI: 10.55524/ijirem.2021.8.6.57 | DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.55524/ijirem.2021.8.6.57
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
Article Tools: Print the Abstract | Indexing metadata | How to cite item | Email this article | Post a Comment
Sh. Sachin Gupta
Competition among organizations, particularly political parties, is an important aspect of democratic policy. The inherently partisan nature of political conflict, however, had too little effect on political psychology. The media has always been a vital part of society. In addition to reporting the events, it also generates public opinion. The media in these areas has a strong democratic stance, although the media landscape has changed dramatically because of the growth of social media. A platform reflects the pulse of society. For India, the world's largest democracy, elections were the most important religion. Political marketing is constantly evolving, with each party providing voters with increasingly creative tools and strategies. By creating a buzz online, he encouraged young people to utilize social media sites like Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. Regular tweets from prominent individuals and media barons even encourage the masses to develop their own views, thus social media should have been "forming opinions and policies" rather than "influencing." The present article examines the impact of social media as a platform for nation building on political, social, and cultural democracy. The current research demonstrates that an improved theoretical perspective based on theory of reasoning is superior to reconciling different approaches to political parties and public opinion. Parties are obviously creating and building political alternatives to influence voter views.
[1] Schattschneider E. Party government... 1960.
[2] Mair P. E. E. Schattschneider’s The Semisovereign People Polit Stud. 1997 Dec;45(5):947–54.
[3] Goren P, Federico CM, Kittilson MC. Source cues, partisan identities, and political value expression. Am J Pol Sci. 2009 Oct;53(4):805–20.
[4] Garnham N, Williams R. Pierre Bourdieu and the sociology of culture: An introduction. Media, Cult Soc. 1980;2(3):209–23.
[5] McQuail D. Mass Communication. Int Encycl Polit Commun. 2016 Jan;1–12.
[6] McQuail D. Mass communication theory: An introduction. 1987.
[7] Williams R. The Significance of ‘Bloomsbury’ as a Social and Cultural Group. Keynes Bloom Gr. 1980;40–67.
[8] Downing J. Radical media: Rebellious communication and social movements. 2000.
[9] Benjamin W. The Author as Producer. Think Photogr. 1982;15–31.
[10] McGraw M. Political judgment: Structure and process. 1995.
[11] Lavine H, Johnston C, Steenbergen M. The ambivalent partisan: How critical loyalty promotes democracy. 2012.
SOMC, Sanskriti University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India (chancellor@sanskriti.edu.in)
No. of Downloads: 25 | No. of Views: 902
Ali Akbar Anggara.
October 2024 - Vol 11, Issue 5
Dipankar Pradhan, Debasish Mondal.
October 2024 - Vol 11, Issue 5
Th John Lerphangam Monsang.
August 2024 - Vol 11, Issue 4